I cannot remember how many times I read people recounting interesting and illuminating conversations with taxi drivers. Normally, I find these reports in books. Famous experts on theirs topics often find something that is worth recounting in these conversations. Inspired by that, I decided to ask all the taxi drivers that I met in the past week or so what they thought of the new law imposing stricter sanctions for drinking and driving in Brazil.
A little bit of background information, for my non-brazilians readers. This law (nicknamed Lei Seca) was enacted in July, imposing severe sanctions (fines and imprisonment) to DUI. It also reduced the level of alcohol permitted in your blood, if your are driving. The law was strictly enforced thus far.
I got three set of interesting comments in my rides in São Paulo.
I asked one driver if he was in favor or against the new law. His response was:
- Just look at the numbers. In two months the government saved R$ 48 million (roughly US$ 24 million).
And he concluded:
- I prefer to see my taxes going to something more useful than paying medical expenses of irresponsible people.
The second guy was less concerned with proper allocation of fiscal resources. Instead, he had a distributive concern with the new law. He thought that poor people were more severely constrained from drinking than richer people. Basically, his argument relied on the fact that many commercial establishments started offering mini-vans or drivers to take their customers home.** They decided to offer these services after a significant drop in alcohol consumption (and consequently in their profits) as soon as the new law was enacted. The problem, he argued, is that only wealthy establishments could afford such services. People who cannot go to these places depend on public transportation, which is neither safe nor reliable. And the biggest problem, according to him, is that public transportation most of the time is not available in the evenings (the subway stops at midnight and the bus lines are drastically reduced). Thus, his conclusion was that less wealthy people were much more affected by the new law than rich people. I do not have numbers to confirm his claims.
The third guy was concerned with enforcement. He said that the law was working because the police got out and arrested people DUI. However, he believed that soon the police will "be more relaxed" about the new law and all drunks will be driving again. If you see the general statement of law enforcement in Brazil, this is a rather persuasive claim. He is basically saying that once the initial excitement with the new law is over, we are back to were we have always been: beautiful laws and an awful reality. Unless there is something different in this case that changes the dynamics of policy making and law enforcement in Brazil. If there is indeed something different, there could be a more optimistic prediction about the future of the new law. And to see if there is something different, just ask what are the incentives for each of the interest groups affected to keep the enforcement of these strict measures against DUI. I will report back in January and you can check the blog to see if your predictions were right or wrong...
** The drivers scheme works as follows: a guy employed by the restaurant drives the customer home in the customer's car. The car is followed by a motorcycle, with another employee of the restaurant (probably a guy who uses his motorcycle to deliver documents during the day -- see my previous blog on motoboys in SP). When they reach the destination, the motoboy takes the driver back to the restaurant for the next drive.